Government Regulations
To quote Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase before Congress on June 13, 2012, "Lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater", ... "I believe in strong regulation, not necessarily more regulation".. He clarified by saying that continuing to add regulation on top of bad, ineffective regulation would just make it more complex and costly and less effective, meaning be a little thoughtful about the regulation that you impose on business. That is the common sense approach. People are concerned when they hear that Congress invites industry experts in to discuss development of laws and regulations for fear of watering down the law/regulation. So, that means they would rather have politicians in Congress who DO NOT understand the industry, develop a new law/regulation on their own? That hurts the industry, the economy and the employees and clients of the industry in question. If Congress is the "executive" representing the people of the US, they should use industry experts and make strong and proper executive decisions that create effective laws with with the best interests of the country in mind, and with out political maneuvering.

Ruling Clears Way for Unions

8/28/15
from The Wall Street Journal,
8/27/15:

Fast-food, construction to feel effects of labor board decision on temp and contract workers.

Contract workers and other temporary employees will be able to more easily unionize following a landmark ruling Thursday by a U.S. federal labor regulator. The ruling from the National Labor Relations Board will ripple through the fast-food, construction and other industries that rely heavily on contract workers and employees of franchisees. Previously, such companies were considered by law to be a step removed from many of their workers when certain labor disputes arose. The decision, which came in a 3-2 vote on a single case before the board involving sanitation workers, is the latest to attempt to tackle the core question of who counts as an employee in a modern economy that is increasingly reliant on shift work, contract workers and other temporary employees. The Labor Department, for example, has been cracking down on companies it says misclassify employees as independent contractors to avoid paying taxes, overtime pay and benefits. Uber Technologies Inc. is facing such accusations by drivers in California that the company has disputed. Meanwhile, the NLRB has pending cases that claim franchisers such as McDonald’s Corp. should be held responsible for alleged labor law violations at independently owned restaurants.

Many businesses have fiercely opposed the change, and not surprisingly. Companies increasingly have been turning to temporary contract workers, a business model that gives them more flexibility to add or shed workers as needed. “If this decision stands, the economic rationale for hiring a subcontractor vanishes,” said Beth Milito, senior legal counsel for the National Federation of Independent Business. “It will make it much harder for self-employed subcontractors to get jobs and of course it will drive up operating expenses for the companies that hire them.” Union groups, meanwhile, have complained to regulators that many businesses exercise control over the pay and working conditions of certain workers but shirk their duties by refusing to claim them as employees.

More From The Wall Street Journal (subscription required):



365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )