Media
The 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, among other rights, grants freedom of the press. It specifically states: "... Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of the press ..." As with the rest of the Constitution, a brilliant political principle without question. With its brilliance though, it does not regulate the quality of the free press and throughout our history we have seen both outstanding journalism and pitiful examples of a free press. In the second decade of the 21st century, there are two strong political ideologies (left & right) controlling the political dialogue in this country. During the 2012 Presidential Election, spin from the left and right are presented as mainstream information and what was formerly mainstream, balanced & unbiased information sources have changed or evolved their format to the point that unbiased reporting is unavailable. In the 2016 Presidential Election, there was no effort at all to cover up the biased reporting of the mainstream media. Today's news sources are targeting specific messages to gain specific ideological audiences, thereby presenting bias. This bias is most times unidentifiable, not completely truthfully nor presented with perspective and context that the reader/viewer/listener requires and expects. Shockingly, sometimes this bias is purposely (NBC) camouflaged (NY Times - 4th paragraph down) from the reader/viewer/listener. In our polarized society, these strong messages on both sides overpower the ability of people with limited time to evaluate issues to find a center, compromise, reasonable or mainstream position. Especially when each side is also saying they offer the center, compromise, reasonable and mainstream position, whether they do or not. There are media watchdog organizations out there, but they also represent an ideological left and right. Much of this website is dedicated to shedding light on the bias in current American journalism. While we long for that great post-WWII journalistic era, where we were served by responsible, professional and largely unbiased journalism, unfortunately, we are no longer so served. That makes it difficult for American citizens to find the truth among the hype, agenda peddling and biased reporting. If you look at the bottom of this page and all pages on this website, you will find major (and some not so major) news organizations listed based on their political leanings, Left or Right. You will immediately notice there are none listed in the center. While there may be the occasional article in any of these news sources which could be a center, balanced and truthful report, by and large the reporting from that news source is defined by its L-R political leanings. The Gray Area is attempting to help its readers by so identifying the biases of the news source from which a report originates to help you identify the spin within the news piece you are reading or watching. We will include an article in the center if we believe it represents the center, a thoughtful, balanced and honest perspective. That way, presented with facts and recognizing the source, you can make up your own mind. In this 'media' section, we comment on the egregiousness of some reporting so that you may see the best and worst of what we must today use as our sources of information. From an analysis of all the sources, THE GRAY AREA HAS CREATED ITS OWN SPECTRUM OF MEDIA BIAS.

Censorship & Credibility

3/25/24; updated 3/26/24
from The Gray Area:
3/24/24; updated 3/26/24:
Former RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel joins NBC, and the backlash from the left wing reporters is loud and unsurprising. Chuck Todd, previous host of “Meet the Press“, told Kristen Welker, after she had McDaniel on the show Sunday, 'I think our bosses owe you an apology for putting you in this situation.' What situation Chuck? Having an interview with the opposition? The interview revealed no interest on the part of Ms. Welker to have an open dialog, but to push  media narratives. “So when NBC made the decision to give her NBC News’s credibility, you got to ask yourself, ‘What does she bring NBC News?’” The answer Chuck is, credibility! NBC has none now. It is a left wing media outfit, period. Maybe McDaniel can stick to her Republican values and hold firm against the political narratives of Republicans held by the media. Then, if NBC doesn't fire her, they may instead generate a little credibility. The volume of this 'insurrection at NBC' was increased today by this distasteful article Please, everyone, welcome the Joker to the Gotham news team! . This article describes clearly who the audience is for NBC. It is only Democrats, that is all they want as an audience and they want to provide one party propaganda (political narratives), not news reporting (you know, uh, journalism). After reading this article, it should be clear that the NBC News organization needs an open minded approach and a realistic perspective on US politics. MSNBC’s president, Rashida Jones, has been trying to address internal backlash from Friday’s announcement, telling employees ‘there are no plans to have McDaniel on MSNBC', or at least won’t foist her presence on unwilling hosts’. Rachel Maddow and others at MSNBC further stated that NBC 'should disqualify her as a paid pundit'. What this means is that only 'paid pundits' who agree with us need apply! Quality journalism illuminated there. No surprise here. This is the same network who pretends the Republican Party is not fielding a candidate for the November elections by censoring everything Trump. More censorship desired by the media, more self-promoting delusion that they represent journalism, and less public credibility. I really hope McDaniel holds out against this attack on her, on free speech, and on a free & honest press to present something that will barely resemble balance in NBC reporting. More From The Washington Post (subscription required): More From CJR: More From JustTheNews:

More From The Washington Post (subscription required):

More From The Washington Post (subscription required):



365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )