Government Regulations
To quote Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase before Congress on June 13, 2012, "Lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater", ... "I believe in strong regulation, not necessarily more regulation".. He clarified by saying that continuing to add regulation on top of bad, ineffective regulation would just make it more complex and costly and less effective, meaning be a little thoughtful about the regulation that you impose on business. That is the common sense approach. People are concerned when they hear that Congress invites industry experts in to discuss development of laws and regulations for fear of watering down the law/regulation. So, that means they would rather have politicians in Congress who DO NOT understand the industry, develop a new law/regulation on their own? That hurts the industry, the economy and the employees and clients of the industry in question. If Congress is the "executive" representing the people of the US, they should use industry experts and make strong and proper executive decisions that create effective laws with with the best interests of the country in mind, and with out political maneuvering.
Archive Related Items

Economic Freedom Promotes Upward Income Mobility

9/7/21
from TPPF,
9/7/21:

What to know: Excessive regulations hurt lower-income workers who are trying to improve their prospects and make a better future for their families, a new study says. The TPPF Take: Economic freedom means more opportunity for everyone. “Regulations too often exclude people from work and opportunity,” says TPPF’s Vance Ginn. “They may require workers to purchase occupational licenses or train to acquire credentials before they can work. This takes time and money, which lower-income earners may not possess, creating a barrier that prevents them from fully participating and advancing in the labor market. Such regulations slow wage growth for lower-income workers.”

More From TPPF:



365 Days Page
Archive Related Items
Comment ( 0 )