Budget Debt
The US Government spends more than it takes in just about every year. Here are the budget deficit numbers by year since 1932. If anyone wants to know why we have a budget problem in this country, all you have to do is look at the running debt clock. We are now at $21T in debt.! But, if big numbers alone don't get your attention, then lets put the $21T in perspective, it represents over 100% of GDP. The nation owed $10.6 trillion on Jan. 20, 2009, when President Obama was sworn in, and he doubled it – more than Bush piled up in two terms. There is bipartisan agreement that we cannot sustain this level of debt. There is also bipartisan agreement that we must correct the outflows exceeding inflows that drives the debt higher every second (see debt clock) . Everyone who manages a checkbook has seen this problem before and knows how to correct it - reduce expenses and increase income. Increasing revenues is critical to the solution, but will not have an immediate impact. Reducing expenses is also critical to the solution and can generate immediate impact. It is the only thing in your control instantly! Sequestration and government shutdown revealed that with immediate impacts in 2012 & 2013. Everything else we here about this subject beyond these two facts is just noise and should be ignored. The political left and right cannot agree on how to correct this problem. The left solution to our problem is to increase taxes on the rich to increase income. Currently the top 20% of income earners pays 80% of the federal tax burden. So do we want them to pay 100%? 110%? 120%? Maybe just write the check every year for the entire cost of government, whatever it is? Clearly this is not a solution. The right wants us to reduce spending and taxes, which was also a poor solution in a recessionary economy, but in a growing economy in 2017 has promise. But, the truth is we must do both (reduce expenses and increase income), we must do it now and it will not be easy. All the political hot air outside these two facts is simply a distraction from the difficult but obvious answer. Trump's tax law in Dec 2017 had an economic stimulation effect. A growing economy will usually increase income (tax revenues for the government) over the 10 years, but not immediately. The Trump tax reform due to money overseas that will be returning home, will have immediate positive revenue impacts. His military defense spending will have a negative national debt impact. To immediately begin to impact our budget deficit and debt problem whiling anticipating increased revenues we also must immediately and dramatically cut spending. That MUST include discretionary spending AND entitlements (Social Security, Medicare & Obamacare) which represent 90% of the problem. The left will say you are hurting education, the homeless, healthcare of all Americans, the elderly and on and on. The right will shout "we are already taxed enough". All This whining MUST be ignored. No one wants to hurt themselves, their families or their neighbors We have no choice but to intelligently make these difficult decisions while minimizing the pain. But there will be pain. And our representatives MUST ACT NOW. It is a dereliction of duty if they do not. The 2 year budget passed Feb 2018 does not do this. It was a purely bi-partisan negotiation (which is good) but gives everything to everyone and makes no tough decisions on spending. Below you can watch the ongoing debate on this critical issue. And hopefully see the solution we need develop. Then, in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic arrives and budget busting, debt and printing money takes on historic proportions!

Where Trump and Harris Supporters Agree

9/16/24
from Maudlin Economics,
9/14/24:

Neil Howe illustrates why it will take a crisis of biblical proportions to balance the budget or even get on track to do so. A significant portion of people in both parties seriously want more spending and tax breaks. Often these sound nice; what curmudgeon can be against newborn child tax credits? But $1 billion here, $1 billion there and soon we’re talking real money. Neil also shows us how difficult it is to cut spending and/or raise taxes. This addiction is a powerful drug.

Download PDF

According to a new WSJ survey, six out of ten economic policies proposed by Trump and Harris received support from almost 50% or more of Republicans, Democrats, and independents. 49% of Republicans support Harris’ plan to provide a $6K tax credit for newborns. 60% support her plan to cap out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs. And 75% support her plan to cap insulin prices at $35. On the other side, 76% of Democrats support Trump’s plan to eliminate taxes on Social Security income. And 76% support his plan to eliminate taxes on tips. (Harris has also since adopted this policy Oh, and where do we find the revenue to fund these goodies? This is a question neither Trump nor Harris address. But voters don’t seem to care. When the WSJ asked respondents if they would support these policies even if there were negative side effects (in particular: “even if they increased the national debt”), support didn’t dip all that much. In the abstract, to be sure, deficit reduction remains very popular. But when it comes to concrete proposals, a new benefit or tax cut beats out deficit reduction in the political marketplace every time. Just before the Trump-Harris debate, according to a Peterson Foundation survey, 61% of Americans said it is “very important” and another 30% “somewhat important” that the candidates talk about their plan to reduce the deficit. Guess how much Trump or Harris talked about deficit reduction? If you guessed anything more than nothing at all, you must not have been watching. If you’re an optimist, you may conclude that both candidates remained mysteriously silent on a topic that would have gained them millions of new voters. If you’re a realist (I hesitate to say a pessimist) you come to a different conclusion—that even if voters know that large deficits are unsustainable, they don’t trust the leaders of either party to reduce them. Today, so long as the roof isn’t leaking, give us what we want. Tomorrow, if the flood comes, leaders will do whatever they have to do. That day is no doubt coming in any event. Until then, at least, we get something.

More From Maudlin Economics:

More From The Wall Street Journal (subscription required):



365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )