Democrats’ Strategy to Keep the Senate

   < < Go Back
from The New York Times,

Colorado’s Democratic junior senator, Michael Bennet is an expectations-buster. With no background in the field, he became a successful financial executive. He won high praise as the head of the Denver school system, even though he had little experience in education, and after being appointed to fill a vacant seat in the United States Senate in 2009, he won election in 2010, a dreadful year for most Democrats.

Mr. Bennet, 49, will be on short lists for vice president in 2016, especially if his strategy as chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee thwarts Republican plans to take control of the chamber this November.

Mr. Bennet thinks a lot about ideas such as innovation and competing in the global marketplace. He worries that the United States will risk its competitive advantage if the government remains paralyzed over immigration reform, infrastructure investments and creating a more efficient tax code.

Generally a progressive Democrat, he often circumvents the partisan divide. This year, however, his main focus has been to keep the Senate in Democratic hands; a Republican takeover would be a nightmare for President Obama.

Losing campaigns — think Barry Goldwater or George McGovern — have long deluded themselves that their special appeal would enlarge the voting universe. That isn’t the Bennet and Cecil theory. They note that the drop-off in voters for presidential elections disproportionately involves Democrats: younger people, lower incomes and minorities. The means to identify, take aim at and reach more passive voters have become much more sophisticated, starting with Mr. Obama’s presidential runs and the increasing use of social media.

Nothing will stem a national tide. But short of that, Sasha Issenberg, who has written extensively on the new techniques of mobilization, argues that the Democrats have the capacity, if they have the resources, to increase marginal turnout to affect a number of close contests.

The central components of success are raising enough money and then recruiting a sizable volunteer force — volunteers are more effective than paid canvassers — to work their own neighborhoods and precincts to register voters and get them to vote.
Continue reading the main story Continue reading the main story
Continue reading the main story

They have databases to identify prospects with all of their demographic essentials and possess the techniques to contact and influence them.

Thus, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and affiliates plan to spend about $60 million on these mobilization efforts, or about one-third of the budget, almost 10 times what the D.S.C.C. spent in 2010.

Republicans dismiss this as pie in the sky, arguing that Mr. Obama’s sinking approval ratings, along with dissatisfaction with the economy and the health care law, will depress Democratic turnout and bring more Republicans to the polls this fall.

Mr. Bennet, who unlike most other Democrats in 2010 relied heavily on field operations in his Senate race, acknowledges this isn’t an easy environment but suggested that the climate and candidates are better than they were four years ago.

“If I could survive in 2010, the notion that with the candidates we have this year we can’t win is just wrong,” he said.

More From The New York Times: