Wind Energy
The wind industry promotes itself as better for the environment than traditional energy sources such as coal and natural gas. But there are many issues associated with Wind. 1. Modern wind turbines depend on rare earth minerals mined primarily from China. Mining one ton of rare earth minerals produces about one ton of radioactive waste, according to the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security. Thus, the US wind industry may well have created more radioactive waste last year than our entire nuclear industry produced in spent fuel. 2. The government plays a large role in energy markets, through subsidies and regulation. Wind projects are unsustainable without government subsidies. On a kilowatt hour (kwh) basis, offshore wind power is estimated to cost 22.15 cents per kwh, while onshore wind is 8.66 cents per kwh, and natural gas combined cycle is only 6.56 per kwh. 3. Energy officials are worried about the potential of power grid collapse due to the use of renewable energy, says the Los Angeles Times, because renewable energy is more unpredictable than traditional forms of energy. 4. Five Million trees have been cut down since 2007 in order to build wind turbines to help Scotland meet its energy goals, says the Daily Caller. 5. Even the thump, thump, thump of wind turbines in Cape Cod are making people sick.

A New Way to Look at Energy Subsidies

from NCPA,

How should energy subsidies be measured? Dr. Roy Cordato, vice president for research at the John Locke Foundation, offers a new approach to measuring government subsidies.

It is easy to manipulate the numbers when it comes to talking about subsidies. For example:

- In 2009, the Environmental Law Institute wrote: "The federal government provided substantially larger subsidies to fossil fuels than to renewables. Subsidies to fossil fuels -- a mature, developed industry that has enjoyed government support for many years -- totaled approximately $72 billion over the study period, representing a direct cost to taxpayers."

- In 2011, the Institute for Energy Research reported: "Solar is being subsidized by over 1,200 times more than coal and oil and natural gas electricity production, and wind is being subsidized over 80 times more than the more conventional fossil fuels on a unit of production basis."

Those numbers are typical of today's energy debate. Green energy advocates will use total dollar amounts when they compare subsidies, without looking at the amount of energy generated by those subsidy dollars. The Environmental Law Institute's statement above fails to take into account that wind and solar energy are much smaller industries than natural gas, coal or oil.

On the other hand, free-market advocates tend to compare the amount of the subsidy with the amount of energy being generated. When one looks at subsidies per unit of energy production, the amount of wind and solar subsidies are dramatically larger than those going to traditional energy.

Cordato argues that the most accurate measurement is a "net subsidies" measurement. He would look at the amount of the subsidy as well as monetary value of policies that penalize the industry being subsidized in order to get a net value. For example:

- A net subsidies comparison would include tax breaks, direct money transfers, the monetized value of mandates to use specific energy sources, or any other special privilege granted to one form of energy over another.- The "penalty" side of the calculation would look at taxes, the cost of regulations on the energy source, and the monetary value of land use restrictions (e.g. ANWR drilling restrictions, or regulations that prevent wind power along mountain ridges).

Because government plays such a large role in energy markets, through subsidies and regulation, Cordata cautions that any comparative estimate regarding energy subsidies alone are incomplete and urges the use of a net subsidies formula.

More From NCPA:

365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )