States End the Tampon Tax After the ‘Year of the Period’

6/8/16
 
   < < Go Back
 

by Maya Rhodan,

from TIME Magazine,
6/2/16:

On May 25, New York State voted to eliminate a “luxury” tax on menstrual products, which the goods had been subject to as non-“necessities” (think medicine, food), joining a handful of states and cities that have done the same. The next day, similar legislation passed in Illinois. These are the most recent wins in what has become a global movement over the past 18 months to change not only the way tampons and pads are taxed and distributed, but also the openness with which we talk about a biological process that for centuries was cast as a curse and a source of shame.

Linda B. Rosenthal, the assembly member who introduced New York State’s bill last May, estimates it will save women in New York City $416.52 over their lifetimes. But money isn’t the only issue, she says: “While this is about a tax on tampons, it’s also about women seeking and gaining their voice.”

Mentions of periods tripled in mainstream media outlets between 2010 and 2015, according to NPR. And all that visibility has helped fuel reform. According to Jennifer Weiss-Wolf of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University, who has been at the forefront of the push, 14 states and three major cities have introduced legislation, amendments or budget lines this year to nix the tax. In July 2015, Canada ended its sales tax on these items. And earlier this year, the United Kingdom proposed a resolution to do the same.

“When the period went public last year, there was an incredible array of forces that brought it to the fore,” says Weiss-Wolf.

Take, for instance, the work of Naama Bloom, the CEO and founder of HelloFlo, a feminine-product delivery service responsible for a viral video that pokes fun at the way young girls learn about their periods and the shame surrounding them. “I think it’s much to do with the culture we live in,” Bloom told TIME last year. “Part of what has been so radical is that I’m not ashamed.”

More From TIME Magazine: