In California, Confiscation Is No Longer A Threat. It’s The Law.

11/19/17
 
   < < Go Back
 

by Charles C.W. Cooke,

from America’s 1st Freedom,
8/31/17:

One federal judge is all that stands between California gun owners and the unprecedented confiscation by the state of millions of dollars of legally purchased property.

At the end of June, California was set to start enforcing a law that America’s gun owners are routinely assured that “nobody, anywhere is proposing.” Had the state not been prevented from implementing the rule by a sensible federal judge, an extraordinary precedent would have been set.

The law to which I am referring, passed by state-level referendum in 2016, requires the confiscation of all firearms magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds—even if those magazines were purchased before the ban. Or, put another way: Having promised gun owners in 2000 that their now-illegal-to-sell property would be safely “grandfathered,” Californians elected brazenly to renege on the deal. Under the terms of the statute, law-abiding Americans would have been obliged to destroy, hand over or transfer out of state their now verboten property.

And if they refused? They’d be guilt

More From America’s 1st Freedom: