How Feminazis Confused Gender Roles

Have you ever heard of a feminist writer named Jody Allard? If you haven’t, you’re about to. And for some reason I was watching an old episode of Elementary on CBS Thursday night, and I did a double-take watching the episode.

RUSH: I’ve never heard of the woman either, so don’t feel bad if you do. Jody Allard. A-L-L-A-R-D. “She might pronounce it Ah-lard. You never know.) The story’s from Ben Shapiro’s website called The Daily Wire, and it’s from late last week when I was gone. Get this now. This woman is a feminist. She is an author and the mother of two sons. Her name is Jody Allard. She “has a habit of shaming her two sons, one of whom she says is suicidal, for simply disagreeing with her, or worse, for simply being male.”

Last week she was writing in some publication called Role Reboot. R-O-L-E. Role Reboot. Now what do you think the hell that is? It’s exactly what I’m talking about. When I say that men and women are confused about the roles they play, I believe… I believe in nature, and I believe the male pursuit of the female is part of the great mystery of life and how it’s necessary for life to perpetuate. Life has one objective: To perpetuate itself, wherever it is. It’s mysterious, and it’s intriguing, and it is fun.

But I don’t think it’s the result of patriarchy or the result of an authoritarian regime dictating the way men and women are or should be. Nature is what it is.

But in this country, women have had more power and influence over the men in their lives than maybe they’ve even be consciously aware of, but it’s been there, and I don’t think it’s a bad thing. Don’t make any false assumptions here. Then feminism comes along, angry about a whole bunch of things — primarily at how nature’s been unkind to them and human nature is something they don’t like — so they seek to alter it. Which means trying to get people to go against what naturally occurs, …

And I think all of these social causes (feminism is just one) creates the same effect on society as a camera on a street corner.

Once you begin a political movement that criticizes men in their natural state and tags them as predators and barbarians, you are going to artificially impact the way men who are aware of that behave. And then you’re gonna have fake. You’re gonna have people trying to behave to type. And since the beginning of time, men have always tried to do what they think women want.

Anyway, so you implement your feminism, which is based on what? Nothing but pure negatives about men and our society and the country. I’m telling you, you are going to affect… This is why, by the way, the enrollment of men on college campuses in many universities is way, way down.

They don’t want to put up with it. Women’s studies here, women’s studies there, angry protests all over the place. That’s not what it’s supposed to be. Life is not supposed to be a protest march. It’s not. It’s supposed to be fun, intriguing, mysterious — and this takes all of that out. So here we have this babe Jody Allard writing last week in a publication called Role Reboot. “She yet again,” apparently she does this frequently, “shamed her sons for their biology,” meaning male, “and then topped herself by explaining that they are, like every other man, ‘not safe.’

“And by ‘not safe,’ she means prospective rapists. Allard first asserts that while her sons are ‘good boys,’ they aren’t ‘safe boys,’ before bragging about a ‘semi-viral’ essay she wrote for the Washington Post in which she shames her sons for their role in feminist-constructed ‘rape culture’ for merely having penises. ‘My essay went semi-viral, and for the first time my sons encountered my words about them on their friends’ phones, their teachers’ computers, and even overheard them discussed by strangers on a crowded metro bus.

“It was one thing to agree to be written about in relative obscurity, and quite another thing to have my words intrude on their daily lives,’ she explains. Unsurprisingly, her teenage boys,” who she has called “not safe” because they’re “potential rapists,” and “she’s publicly shamed for no other reason than their anatomy, now resent her. One of her sons is even turning to — gasp — conservatism: ‘One of my sons was hurt by my words, although he’s never told me so. He doesn’t understand why I lumped him and his brother together in my essay.

“He sees himself as the “good” one, the one who is sensitive and thoughtful, and who listens instead of reacts. He doesn’t understand that even quiet misogyny is misogyny…’” Her own son is a misogynist! “He doesn’t understand … that not all sexists sound like Twitter trolls. He is angry at me now, although he won’t admit that either, and his anger led him to conservative websites and YouTube channels; places where he can surround himself with righteous indignation against feminists, and tell himself it’s ungrateful women like me who are the problem.’”

How would you like to be this babe’s son?

It’s Elementary. This stars Jonny Lee… Jonny Lee… He’s a British actor. It’s Jonny Lee Miller and Lucy Liu. You know who Lucy Liu is? Yeah, well, she plays Dr. Watson. And this is CBS’ takeoff on the Sherlock Holmes genre. And in this scene Holmes and Watson are pursuing the criminal, and they’ve found her.

It’s a woman, and it’s sort of a play on The Hound of the Baskervilles. The woman has a vicious dog that hates men. Whenever this dog sees men it starts barking and threatens to attack, and only the female owner can get the dog to back down. Sherlock Holmes adroitly discovered this criminal’s partner in crime was a man because when he showed up the dog didn’t bark. Meaning the dog was familiar with the man, which meant the criminal had a partner and they identified who it was. And he, Holmes, is explaining to the criminal how it is he sized her up and caught her.

WATSON: As soon as we made it clear how simple it was to compare his DNA to the blood droplets he left at the captain’s house, he rolled on you. He told us about the bowl you stole and a few other artifacts; how you thought you could get over a million dollars for them.

HOLMES: “How did we think to look for him?” you ask. Well, you have your feminazi hound to thank for that.

RUSH: “Your feminazi hound.” You ought to see the woman’s face. I know she’s an actress. But when Holmes tells her “your feminazi hound gave you away.” “How did we figure it out? Because your feminazi hound.” … That’s all it was.

More From Rush Limbaugh: