War on Religion
If you doubt there is a War on Religion, consider this. Every day in America we hear of high school cheerleaders who can't use religious words like faith, Jesus Christ, hope and love on banners; valedictorians at high schools are told not to include religious messages or risk punishment; proselytizing in the military is grounds for a courts martial; desecrating war memorials with crosses because they are religious symbols; HS football players cannot put memorial crosses on their helmets; and on and on and on. Tell me that this action by the Chinese government is not the same thing that is happening here! "Chinese police reportedly surrounded the town of Donglu on Sunday to prevent its residents, the majority of whom are Catholic, from holding a procession in honor of the Virgin Mary." Religious prejudice and intolerance is growing in Europe often under the guise of tolerance. It is exactly the same thing that is happening here. It makes the War on Religion seem like such an insufficient label for what must really be going on, a totalitarian fear and censorship of religious activity throughout the world, including America. Religion and Public Life in America makes the case that "today's secular culture views orthodox Christian churches as troublesome, retrograde, and reactionary forces. They’re seen as anti-science, anti-gay, and anti-women—which is to say anti-progress as the Left defines progress. Not surprisingly, then, the Left believes society will be best served if Christians are limited in their influence on public life. And there won’t just be arguments; there will be laws as well." Wake up America and demand the return of Religious Freedom in America. The country was built on the principle. The 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America grants freedom of worship, speech & press; the right to petition the government & to assemble peaceably. Specifically with regard to "religion" it states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Many on the left have tried for at least 50 years to re-write history with regard to "separation of church and state" and to downgrade the religious beliefs of the founding fathers. This quote should satisfy both questions: "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports ... and let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle." George Washington, Farewell Speech, 9/17/1796 (from "Being George Washington"). See the dialogue from both sides below.

Apparently, it's not the Constitution, but the makeup of the 'current court' that matters

6/17/21
from The Gray Area:
6/17/21:

The war on religion, as well as the LGBTQ 'trump card', each took a hit today at the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision, siding with a Catholic foster agency in a dispute against the city of Philadelphia over whether it should be banned from participating in the city's foster program because it excludes same-sex couples. The unanimous decision is almost as surprising as the overall decision, with each of the 3 liberal justices siding with the 5 conservative justices and Chief Justice John Roberts. For the most part the liberal justices vote in blocks with liberal political causes. However, in 2021, those liberal justices have curiously changed that pattern and voted irregularly on a variety of other decisions. The New York Times gave a nod tothis point when they said this The unanimous ruling was further evidence that claims of religious liberty almost always prevail in the current court. 'Current court'? Clearly a shot at the minority left wing justices not standing for the left's political priorities and further signalling a need for a different court (packing) that would, while ignoring the Constitution. Today the Constitution simultaneously 'trumped' both the LGBTQ and the 'freedom from' religion activists. LGBTQ was not really impacted except as the tool used by the 'freedom from' religion activists to further erode religious freedom in America. But, the 'freedom from' religion activists could not pass Constitutional 'strict scrutiny'. Hurrah for the Constitution and for the Supreme Court Justices who actually read it.



365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )