War on Religion
If you doubt there is a War on Religion, consider this. Every day in America we hear of high school cheerleaders who can't use religious words like faith, Jesus Christ, hope and love on banners; valedictorians at high schools are told not to include religious messages or risk punishment; proselytizing in the military is grounds for a courts martial; desecrating war memorials with crosses because they are religious symbols; HS football players cannot put memorial crosses on their helmets; and on and on and on. Tell me that this action by the Chinese government is not the same thing that is happening here! "Chinese police reportedly surrounded the town of Donglu on Sunday to prevent its residents, the majority of whom are Catholic, from holding a procession in honor of the Virgin Mary." Religious prejudice and intolerance is growing in Europe often under the guise of tolerance. It is exactly the same thing that is happening here. It makes the War on Religion seem like such an insufficient label for what must really be going on, a totalitarian fear and censorship of religious activity throughout the world, including America. Religion and Public Life in America makes the case that "today's secular culture views orthodox Christian churches as troublesome, retrograde, and reactionary forces. They’re seen as anti-science, anti-gay, and anti-women—which is to say anti-progress as the Left defines progress. Not surprisingly, then, the Left believes society will be best served if Christians are limited in their influence on public life. And there won’t just be arguments; there will be laws as well." Wake up America and demand the return of Religious Freedom in America. The country was built on the principle. The 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America grants freedom of worship, speech & press; the right to petition the government & to assemble peaceably. Specifically with regard to "religion" it states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Many on the left have tried for at least 50 years to re-write history with regard to "separation of church and state" and to downgrade the religious beliefs of the founding fathers. This quote should satisfy both questions: "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports ... and let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle." George Washington, Farewell Speech, 9/17/1796 (from "Being George Washington"). See the dialogue from both sides below.

SCOTUS confirms Progressives are 'bigots'

6/4/18
from The Gray Area:
6/4/18:

SCOTUS decision today in favor of the Colorado baker who would not bake a special cake for a gay couple is huge in that it exposes so many of the left's false narratives. Listen to a gay man and a black woman explain it. 1. The decision is narrow, yet clear, as it provides directions specific to this case using Constitutional law without limiting future claims regarding issues of discrimination. One person's freedoms do not automatically trump (no pun intended) another person's freedoms, just because the ruling class says so. What a breath of fresh air from the Court. Go to the 14:00 mark of the following podcast. 2. Progressives are about people, fair, inclusive, non-racial and tolerant. That is BS, and everyone knows it, except the media. Now, the Supreme Court has explained exactly how intolerant the left is and called them "bigots" in the majority opinion. RUSH: it was Justice Kennedy who wrote the majority decision. And the left is scared to death over this, and they’re out there saying, “Don’t worry. It’s very, very narrow. It’s a very narrow interpretation, and it’s not a constitutional interpretation, so don’t worry about it.” But they can’t stop worrying about it. CNN hasn’t stopped analyzing it, hasn’t stopped talking about it. The reason they’re trying to say it’s narrow is that the court’s ruling today did have a lot to do with the way the baker was treated by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. They called him a Nazi. They said he was a Holocaust denier. They gave him the usual deranged, insane left-wing insults at the hearing at the Colorado Civil Rights Commission on this dispute, whether he should have to bake a cake for a gay wedding. He said he didn’t want to, it violated his religious beliefs. And the court said we can’t have this kind of decision-making. We can’t have this man’s religious rights denigrated in this way by the Civil Rights Commission. So in a sense, the ruling was not constitutional, but, folks, to tell you how important this is and how big it is, you have to look at what would have happened if it had gone the other way.

3. Listen to a gay man describe the Supreme Court's 'gay baker' decision today. RUSH: Fine. Thank you for calling. CALLER: So I told your screener — and, first of all, I’m very nervous. But I just want to say that I agree with the ruling today. And as someone who is married to a man who grew up Catholic and who had to hide who he was for a very long time out of fear of what would happen with his family, it does not make our situation any easier when these militants are on the news because they do not represent me. His family didn’t show up at our wedding because they believe a marriage is between one man and one woman. And I don’t want to brand them a bigot or a homophobe for the rest of their lives when I could have an opportunity to have a relationship with them. I’d rather understand where they’re coming from and try to build off of what we have in common than brand them over a decision like a cake and then not have a relationship with the man I love’s family. ... I think these militants make it worse, not better, and they don’t have me — ... — in mind when they’re out there doing it. RUSH: That’s interesting. The militant… See, I have long thought that, but I thought that I was kind of in a very tiny minority on that. CALLER: No. I think they are. I just think they’re really loud and obnoxious, and so they get on the news. RUSH: What do you think their purpose is? ‘Cause in this cake case… I mean, Travis, if — CALLER: They went on TV, and they said what their case was. They said it was never about the cake; it was about making them do what they wanted them to do. And I would rather go get a cake from somewhere else and not be on the news and have a chance — at understanding where other people are coming from — RUSH: Exactly! CALLER: — than force my will on them any more than I want them to force their will on me. I know a lot of people don’t accept gay marriage. However, it’s a lifestyle choice I made. They choose not to bake me a cake. I’ll get one somewhere else. RUSH: Let me tell you, as time goes on and particularly in younger demographics, more and more people are accepting gay marriage and gay relationships. The Millennial generation has no problem at all with it. CALLER: My sexuality makes up so small of who I am as a person; it really shouldn’t matter. You do what you do in your home; I’ll do what I do in mine. In the meantime, we should all be nice to each other in public. I get a cake anywhere, and I’ll bake it if I have to. RUSH: Travis, thank you. I appreciate the call. That is the key. ... Probably in cahoots with some militant political gay group, they found a bakery that they knew would refuse to do it and walked in there and got exactly what they wanted because this is about forcing… He said it. This is about forcing a certain set of social and political beliefs and making them acquiesce to it. And beyond that, after they acquiesce to it, they will love it. And if you don’t, they’re gonna come after you. 4. SCOTUS decision is huge in that it exposes the left's objective "that you must do what we want you to do". RUSH: What do you think their purpose is? CALLER: They went on TV, and they said what their case was. They said it was never about the cake; it was about making them do what they wanted them to do. And I would rather go get a cake from somewhere else and not be on the news and have a chance — 5. Black woman insulted by LGBTQ argument that the gay experience is the same as the black experience with segregation. Go to the 15:15 mark of the following podcast.

More From Rush Limbaugh:

Title,


365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )
Leave a Reply
Name*
E-mail*
Comment