Food issues
When entering any grocery store in any city/town or obscure spot on the map, it doesn't take significant degree of observation to realize how blessed we are with the varied and plentiful food supply in this country. The same when you try to decide which of thousands of restaurants available within 20 miles of your location you would like to have breakfast, lunch or dinner. Unfortunately we take it for granted. Our ability to produce, cleanse, regulate, package and distribute food to our fellow citizens is unprecedented in human history. In addition to convenience and variety, public health has improved significantly due to elimination of food and water borne illnesses. On the opposite side of access to varied and plentiful food supplies are decisions on how much food is needed and which are the best foods for your individual health. As a result of poor choices, childhood obesity has grown in this country. In addition, we are facing worldwide population growth and the resulting increase in demand for safe food. The challenge for us to maintain the convenient and healthy access to plentiful and varied food supplies is to do things necessary to make sure the planet can sustain needed levels of production, minimize waste and make personal food choices that are in our best interest. Follow the public discourse below.

The FDA's Menu Labeling Rule

7/22/15
from NCPA,
7/22/15:

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated that many chain restaurants and other "similar" food establishments list the calorie count of the food they sell. The requirement will take effect nationwide in December 2016, more than six and a half years after the ACA became law. On July 9, 2015 the FDA yielded to industry pressure, announcing that it would push back the rule's effective date by one year, from December 1, 2015 to December 1, 2016. The requirement is partly a response to the following:

- A little more than one in three adults are obese, and an additional one in three are overweight. - The percentage of total food calories consumed in restaurants has almost doubled, from about 18 percent in the 1970s to about 33 percent today. - A small reduction in calorie intake can go a long way. A March 2015 study in the same journal concluded that among all consumers, there is a decrease of ten to twenty calories per meal. The FDA estimates that despite the cost of adding nutritional information to the menus, the new requirement will produce a "stream of benefits" of anywhere from $3.7 billion to $10.4 billion over the next twenty years. However, there are several other concerns with the new rule. - Some believe that calorie labeling had wide industry support because it was preferable to more onerous but far more effective obesity-reduction policies -- in particular -- taxing the sugar content of food. - The supermarket industry had said it might have to spend up to a billion dollars to implement the new labeling requirements. - A meta-analysis in the May 2015 issue of the American Journal of Public Health found no significant impact in the relationship between calorie labeling and what consumers actually order.

More From NCPA:



365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )