Budget Debt
The US Government spends more than it takes in just about every year. Here are the budget deficit numbers by year since 1932. If anyone wants to know why we have a budget problem in this country, all you have to do is look at the running debt clock. We are now at $21T in debt.! But, if big numbers alone don't get your attention, then lets put the $21T in perspective, it represents over 100% of GDP. The nation owed $10.6 trillion on Jan. 20, 2009, when President Obama was sworn in, and he doubled it – more than Bush piled up in two terms. There is bipartisan agreement that we cannot sustain this level of debt. There is also bipartisan agreement that we must correct the outflows exceeding inflows that drives the debt higher every second (see debt clock) . Everyone who manages a checkbook has seen this problem before and knows how to correct it - reduce expenses and increase income. Increasing revenues is critical to the solution, but will not have an immediate impact. Reducing expenses is also critical to the solution and can generate immediate impact. It is the only thing in your control instantly! Sequestration and government shutdown revealed that with immediate impacts in 2012 & 2013. Everything else we here about this subject beyond these two facts is just noise and should be ignored. The political left and right cannot agree on how to correct this problem. The left solution to our problem is to increase taxes on the rich to increase income. Currently the top 20% of income earners pays 80% of the federal tax burden. So do we want them to pay 100%? 110%? 120%? Maybe just write the check every year for the entire cost of government, whatever it is? Clearly this is not a solution. The right wants us to reduce spending and taxes, which was also a poor solution in a recessionary economy, but in a growing economy in 2017 has promise. But, the truth is we must do both (reduce expenses and increase income), we must do it now and it will not be easy. All the political hot air outside these two facts is simply a distraction from the difficult but obvious answer. Trump's tax law in Dec 2017 had an economic stimulation effect. A growing economy will usually increase income (tax revenues for the government) over the 10 years, but not immediately. The Trump tax reform due to money overseas that will be returning home, will have immediate positive revenue impacts. His military defense spending will have a negative national debt impact. To immediately begin to impact our budget deficit and debt problem whiling anticipating increased revenues we also must immediately and dramatically cut spending. That MUST include discretionary spending AND entitlements (Social Security, Medicare & Obamacare) which represent 90% of the problem. The left will say you are hurting education, the homeless, healthcare of all Americans, the elderly and on and on. The right will shout "we are already taxed enough". All This whining MUST be ignored. No one wants to hurt themselves, their families or their neighbors We have no choice but to intelligently make these difficult decisions while minimizing the pain. But there will be pain. And our representatives MUST ACT NOW. It is a dereliction of duty if they do not. The 2 year budget passed Feb 2018 does not do this. It was a purely bi-partisan negotiation (which is good) but gives everything to everyone and makes no tough decisions on spending. Below you can watch the ongoing debate on this critical issue. And hopefully see the solution we need develop. Then, in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic arrives and budget busting, debt and printing money takes on historic proportions!

The debt deal is not perfect, but it passed anyway

5/31/23; updated 6/1/23
from The Gray Area:
5/31/23; updated 6/1/23:

If you read the left & right media regarding the Biden/McCarthy debt deal, it becomes clear that the deal is a relief to the Democrats. They are almost in unison (some are making token complaints but nothing serious) in support of the deal. That is because it presents them with the increase in the debt limit, meaning the possibility of more spending. Democrats say they are concerned about these elements of the deal: -student loan forgiveness going away (they weren't going to get it through the courts anyway) -some work requirements being added (token) -weaker government spending will hurt jobs (narrative more than reality) -climate change - WVa pipeline (token for Manchin) Realistically, they just want the increase in the spending limit, so expect 100% Democrat voting block for the deal. Conservative Republicans have the biggest problems with the deal , justifiably so, because they are not getting the spending reduction they want and the country requires. They believe, for some reason, that they can get more than this version without pain to anyone but Democrat politicians, which defies reality. Hopefully the negotiations will allow those Republicans to vote against the deal for political purposes, and the bill will pass the House and move to the Senate tonight. [UPDATE: This did happen and the Senate Passed the deal on June 1st, sending it to Pres. Biden's desk for signature.] Something is better than nothing now, and there is something in this deal. There is nothing good to come from continued negotiations at this point or exceeding the self-imposed debt limit. I don't think the US will default on any obligations, but I do believe that financing government debt would become more expensive and that is not a good thing. Even if more Democrats than Republicans vote to pass the bill, it is a good thing. As a matter of fact, that would make the most sense at this time since Democrats get what they want. However, one thing that is critical to change in the bill is the expiration date. It needs to be January 31st, 2025, not January 1st. The new Congress and President needs to take office before it expires. There is no doubt that government spending needs to be reduced dramatically, but realistically that can only happen in chunks, over time, and with different election results. Take this deal as a win and move on tot he next battle.

More From FoxNews:

More From The Washington Post (subscription required):



365 Days Page
Comment ( 0 )